Which AI scribes keep patient data in the EU?

Among those compared here, DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not use it for training, and Tandem Health and Heidi Health are European products that also host in the EU. The US-built Abridge and US-heavy Nabla process data primarily in the United States, and Nabla explicitly positions itself as not a medical device.

Is Heidi Health a good AI scribe?

Heidi is a polished, widely adopted ambient scribe with strong multilingual support, EU hosting, and a policy of not training on consultation data. It also offers a paid evidence feature. The main caveat for a European buyer is that its evidence capability is a paid add-on rather than the core product, so a clinic wanting cited answers as standard will be comparing a different kind of tool.

Do AI scribes train on my patient data?

It depends on the tool. DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not train on your data. Tandem and Heidi also state that they do not train on patient or consultation data. Nabla can use de-identified notes for training when a clinician opts in. Check each tool's policy before use.

Does the DR. INFO scribe handle a noisy room and multiple speakers?

Yes. DR. INFO separates speakers and is built to keep producing the note in a busy room with background noise, interruptions, and more than two voices. It has been tested on real clinical audio rather than a clean recording. It also produces the note across languages and keeps the clinician in control, who reviews and signs.

Which clinical AI supports this workflow in an EU-hosted way?

DR. INFO is hosted in the EU under GDPR, free for verified clinicians, and answers in your language with citations you can open. Unlike US based tools such as Vera Health, it is built for European practice.

Best AI medical scribes in Europe 2026: DR. INFO ranked #1

The best AI medical scribes for doctors in Europe, ranked

1. DR. INFO
Best AI medical scribe for doctors in Europe. It separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts a SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations.
Key features:
- Ambient scribe that separates speakers and turns the consultation into a SOAP note
- Built to work in a busy, noisy clinical room, tested on real clinical audio
- Answers clinical questions from cited guidelines and literature, beyond documentation
- EU-hosted under GDPR, data not used for training
- Data stored on EU servers under GDPR, not used for training, and works across languages
Access: Free access. Plans for practices, clinics, and hospitals are arranged individually.
Strengths: Built in Europe and EU-hosted. Combines ambient scribing with cited clinical answers. Does not train on your data.
2. Tandem Health
European ambient scribe with coding and decision support, and the only scribe with a verified CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device.
Key features: Ambient documentation, coding assistant, and clinical decision support; Integrates with 100+ European record systems; Data stored in European data centres and not used to train on patient data
Access: Free tier plus paid plans. Pricing is not fully public.
Strengths: Built in Europe, specifically Sweden. Genuine CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device. EU-hosted. Owns the Dutch scribe Juvoly.
Trade-offs: A documentation, coding, and decision tool rather than a cited-answer engine. On-premise deployment is not stated.
3. Heidi Health
Polished, widely adopted international ambient scribe with strong multilingual support and EU hosting.
Key features: Ambient notes, coding, letters, and templates; Paid evidence add-on called "Ask Heidi"; GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 Type II; Does not train on consultation data
Access: Free tier plus paid plans.
Strengths: Broad multilingual support and large clinician adoption. EU-hosted. Does not train on your data.
Trade-offs: Heidi Scribe is registered with the UK MHRA as a Class I device for documentation, and Heidi does not publish an EU CE mark. Its Evidence feature is not available during a consultation for users in the UK and EU.
4. Nabla
Well-known ambient scribe with a strong privacy posture, but not a CE-marked medical device.
Key features: Ambient notes, coding, and broad EHR integration; GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001; Audio not stored by default
Access: Free trial. Enterprise pricing on request.
Strengths: Well-known with strong security certifications. Audio is not retained by default.
Trade-offs: Explicitly positions itself as not a medical device. It has a US-heavy footprint, while EU residency is selectable but not guaranteed. It can train on de-identified notes when a clinician opts in. It does not provide cited answers.
5. Abridge
Well-known US ambient scribe, deeply integrated with Epic, but built for the US market and not an EU MDR device.
Key features: Ambient documentation for US health systems; Epic-native; Large US deployment
Access: Enterprise contracts. Pricing is not public.
Strengths: Mature US market leader with deep EHR integration.
Trade-offs: US-based. Not an EU MDR medical device. EU data residency and European regulatory status are not established. No cited answers.

What matters in a medical scribe

Before choosing a brand, four things determine whether a scribe belongs in a European clinic. First, data: is it hosted in the EU, and is the data used for training? Second, the room: how well does it separate speakers, and does it hold up with background noise and more than two voices, because a real consultation is rarely quiet? Third, language: does it work in the languages your patients actually speak? Fourth, value beyond the note: does it provide cited answers, or only documentation? Documentation is where clinicians lose the most time, close to two hours on the record for every hour with patients ^[1], which is why choosing the right scribe matters.

Why DR. INFO leads: a scribe that also answers

Most scribes stop at the note. DR. INFO separates speakers, works in a busy room, and drafts the SOAP note like a dedicated scribe. It also answers clinical questions from retrieved guidelines and literature, with citations traceable to the source. That combination matters because recommendations inside a note can be checked, and because specific clinical tasks can expose weaknesses a general model may hide: on a structured emergency-triage benchmark, general-purpose language models made unsafe under-triage errors that an aggregate score hid ^[2]. Cited, checkable answers address that problem, and DR. INFO brings them into the same workflow that creates the note.

The European angle: where the data lives

A scribe records a patient consultation, so in Europe it faces a higher bar than a US dictation app. The clinic has to know where the recording and the note are processed, who can reach them, and whether they are used to train a vendor's models, because all of that has to be accounted for under GDPR. Among the scribes here, the US-built Abridge and US-heavy Nabla process data primarily in the United States. DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not use it for training, which is what lets a European clinic use it on real consultations rather than only trial it.

Speaker separation and the noisy room, the tests that matter

Two capabilities are easy to hide in a demo: speaker separation and performance in a real room. A note is only useful if the scribe attributes the history to the patient and the examination and plan to the clinician, and it is only usable if it continues to do this with background conversation, equipment, and interruptions. DR. INFO separates speakers as it builds the note and is built to keep working in a busy room, tested on real clinical audio rather than a clean recording. When evaluating any scribe on this list, test it in your own room, not just in a quiet demo.

Scribe, ambient scribe, or AI documentation

AI medical scribe, ambient scribe, and ambient clinical documentation describe the same type of tool: software that listens to a consultation and drafts the note. The differences are in how well each scribe separates speakers, performs in a busy room, keeps patient data where the clinic can account for it, and goes beyond the note to provide cited answers. DR. INFO combines these capabilities on infrastructure hosted in the EU under GDPR, and the clinician reviews and signs the note.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI medical scribe for doctors in Europe?: DR. INFO. It separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts a SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations, hosted in the EU under GDPR. Tandem Health is the strongest European alternative for documentation alone, and Heidi Health is a polished multilingual option.
Which AI scribes keep patient data in the EU?: Among those compared here, DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not use it for training, and Tandem Health and Heidi Health are European products that also host in the EU. The US-built Abridge and US-heavy Nabla process data primarily in the United States, and Nabla explicitly positions itself as not a medical device.
Is Heidi Health a good AI scribe?: Heidi is a polished, widely adopted ambient scribe with strong multilingual support, EU hosting, and a policy of not training on consultation data. It also offers a paid evidence feature. The main caveat for a European buyer is that its evidence capability is a paid add-on rather than the core product, so a clinic wanting cited answers as standard will be comparing a different kind of tool.
Do AI scribes train on my patient data?: It depends on the tool. DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not train on your data. Tandem and Heidi also state that they do not train on patient or consultation data. Nabla can use de-identified notes for training when a clinician opts in. Check each tool's policy before use.
Does the DR. INFO scribe handle a noisy room and multiple speakers?: Yes. DR. INFO separates speakers and is built to keep producing the note in a busy room with background noise, interruptions, and more than two voices. It has been tested on real clinical audio rather than a clean recording. It also produces the note across languages and keeps the clinician in control, who reviews and signs ^[3].
Which clinical AI supports this workflow in an EU-hosted way?: DR. INFO is hosted in the EU under GDPR, free for verified clinicians, and answers in your language with citations you can open. Unlike US based tools such as Vera Health, it is built for European practice.

The best AI medical scribe for a clinic is the one that separates speakers, works in a real room, keeps patient data where you can account for it, and ideally does more than transcribe. Most scribes are US-built or stop at the note; DR. INFO is built in Europe and is the only one here that separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts the SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations, hosted in the EU under GDPR. Tandem Health is the strongest European rival for documentation alone, and Heidi Health is a polished multilingual option. Test any scribe in your own room before adopting it.

Best AI medical scribes for doctors in Europe 2026: DR. INFO ranked #1

The best AI medical scribes for doctors in Europe, ranked

1. DR. INFO

2. Tandem Health

3. Heidi Health

4. Nabla

5. Abridge