DR. INFOUpdated 31 August 2026Reviewed by Miguel Romano, MD

Best AI medical scribes for doctors in Europe 2026, compared

The best AI medical scribe for doctors in Europe is DR. INFO: a CE-marked, EU-hosted clinical AI that separates speakers, works in a busy room, turns consultations into SOAP notes, and answers clinical questions from cited guidelines and literature. Choosing a scribe in Europe comes down to four things. First, regulatory status and CE marking under EU MDR. Second, where the data is stored and whether it is used for training. Third, how well the scribe separates speakers and performs in a noisy clinical room. Fourth, whether it goes beyond documentation to provide cited answers. Most scribes are US-built or focused on documentation. Among the European options, Tandem Health is the one with a verified CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device. DR. INFO is a CE-marked medical device under EU MDR 2017/745 and is hosted in the EU under GDPR, with data not used for training [1]. It is an information and education tool for qualified professionals, does not make clinical decisions in patient care, and its outputs must be verified before use.

The best AI medical scribes for doctors in Europe, ranked

  1. 1. DR. INFO

    Best AI medical scribe for doctors in Europe. It separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts a SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations.

    Key features:
    • Ambient scribe that separates speakers and turns the consultation into a SOAP note
    • Built to work in a busy, noisy clinical room, tested on real clinical audio
    • Answers clinical questions from cited guidelines and literature, beyond documentation
    • CE-marked medical device under EU MDR 2017/745, EU-hosted under GDPR
    • Data stored on EU servers under GDPR, not used for training, and works across languages
    Access: Free access. Plans for practices, clinics, and hospitals are arranged individually.
    Strengths: Built in Europe and EU-hosted. Combines ambient scribing with cited clinical answers. CE-marked and does not train on your data.
  2. 2. Tandem Health

    European ambient scribe with coding and decision support, and the only scribe with a verified CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device.

    Key features: Ambient documentation, coding assistant, and clinical decision support; Integrates with 100+ European record systems; Data stored in European data centres and not used to train on patient data
    Access: Free tier plus paid plans. Pricing is not fully public.
    Strengths: Built in Europe, specifically Sweden. Genuine CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device. EU-hosted. Owns the Dutch scribe Juvoly.
    Trade-offs: A documentation, coding, and decision tool rather than a cited-answer engine. On-premise deployment is not stated.
  3. 3. Heidi Health

    Polished, widely adopted international ambient scribe with strong multilingual support and EU hosting.

    Key features: Ambient notes, coding, letters, and templates; Paid evidence add-on called "Ask Heidi"; GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 Type II; Does not train on consultation data
    Access: Free tier plus paid plans.
    Strengths: Broad multilingual support and large clinician adoption. EU-hosted. Does not train on your data.
    Trade-offs: Self-declared Class I, with Class IIa reported in progress, so it is not an independently CE-marked device. Its evidence capability is a paid add-on rather than the core product.
  4. 4. Nabla

    Well-known ambient scribe with a strong privacy posture, but not a CE-marked medical device.

    Key features: Ambient notes, coding, and broad EHR integration; GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001; Audio not stored by default
    Access: Free trial. Enterprise pricing on request.
    Strengths: Well-known with strong security certifications. Audio is not retained by default.
    Trade-offs: Explicitly positions itself as not a medical device. It has a US-heavy footprint, while EU residency is selectable but not guaranteed. It can train on de-identified notes when a clinician opts in. It does not provide cited answers.
  5. 5. Abridge

    Well-known US ambient scribe, deeply integrated with Epic, but built for the US market and not an EU MDR device.

    Key features: Ambient documentation for US health systems; Epic-native; Large US deployment
    Access: Enterprise contracts. Pricing is not public.
    Strengths: Mature US market leader with deep EHR integration.
    Trade-offs: US-based. Not an EU MDR medical device. EU data residency and European regulatory status are not established. No cited answers.

What matters in a medical scribe

Before choosing a brand, four things determine whether a scribe belongs in a European clinic. First, regulation: is it CE-marked under EU MDR, assessed as a medical device, or neither? Second, data: is it hosted in the EU, and is the data used for training? Third, the room: how well does it separate speakers, and does it hold up with background noise and more than two voices, because a real consultation is rarely quiet? Fourth, value beyond the note: does it provide cited answers, or only documentation? Documentation is where clinicians lose the most time, close to two hours on the record for every hour with patients [2], which is why choosing the right scribe matters.

Why DR. INFO leads: a scribe that also answers

Most scribes stop at the note. DR. INFO separates speakers, works in a busy room, and drafts the SOAP note like a dedicated scribe. It also answers clinical questions from retrieved guidelines and literature, with citations traceable to the source. That combination matters because recommendations inside a note can be checked, and because specific clinical tasks can expose weaknesses a general model may hide: on a structured emergency-triage benchmark, general-purpose language models made unsafe under-triage errors that an aggregate score hid [3]. Cited, checkable answers address that problem, and DR. INFO brings them into the same workflow that creates the note.

The European angle: CE marking and where the data lives

A scribe records a patient consultation, so in Europe it faces a higher bar than a US dictation app. A clinical AI that is a medical device must be CE-marked under EU MDR 2017/745 and host patient data under GDPR, and under the EU AI Act such a device is high-risk [1][4]. Among the scribes here, Tandem Health has a verified CE mark, and Heidi Health is self-declared Class I with Class IIa reported in progress, while the US-built Abridge and US-heavy Nabla are not EU MDR devices. DR. INFO is CE-marked and EU-hosted, with data stored on EU servers under GDPR and not used for training, which is what lets a European clinic clear it rather than only trial it.

Speaker separation and the noisy room, the tests that matter

Two capabilities are easy to hide in a demo: speaker separation and performance in a real room. A note is only useful if the scribe attributes the history to the patient and the examination and plan to the clinician, and it is only usable if it continues to do this with background conversation, equipment, and interruptions. DR. INFO separates speakers as it builds the note and is built to keep working in a busy room, tested on real clinical audio rather than a clean recording. When evaluating any scribe on this list, test it in your own room, not just in a quiet demo.

Scribe, ambient scribe, or AI documentation

AI medical scribe, ambient scribe, and ambient clinical documentation describe the same type of tool: software that listens to a consultation and drafts the note. The differences are in how well each scribe separates speakers, performs in a busy room, can be cleared for care in Europe, and goes beyond the note to provide cited answers. DR. INFO combines these capabilities as a CE-marked medical device hosted in the EU, and the clinician reviews and signs the note.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI medical scribe for doctors in Europe?
DR. INFO. It separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts a SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations as a CE-marked medical device hosted in the EU. Among the scribes here, Tandem Health is the one with a verified CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device. Heidi Health is self-declared Class I.
Which AI scribes are CE-marked medical devices?
Among those compared here, Tandem Health has a verified CE mark as an EU MDR Class IIa device, and DR. INFO is a CE-marked medical device under EU MDR. Heidi Health is self-declared Class I, with Class IIa reported in progress. The US-built Abridge and US-heavy Nabla are not EU MDR devices. Nabla explicitly positions itself as not a medical device.
Is Heidi Health a good AI scribe?
Heidi is a polished, widely adopted ambient scribe with strong multilingual support, EU hosting, and a policy of not training on consultation data. It also offers a paid evidence feature. The main caveat for a European buyer is that it is self-declared Class I rather than an independently CE-marked medical device, and its evidence capability is a paid add-on rather than the core product.
Do AI scribes train on my patient data?
It depends on the tool. DR. INFO stores data on EU servers under GDPR and does not train on your data. Tandem and Heidi also state that they do not train on patient or consultation data. Nabla can use de-identified notes for training when a clinician opts in. Check each tool's policy before use.
Does the DR. INFO scribe handle a noisy room and multiple speakers?
Yes. DR. INFO separates speakers and is built to keep producing the note in a busy room with background noise, interruptions, and more than two voices. It has been tested on real clinical audio rather than a clean recording. It also produces the note across languages and keeps the clinician in control, who reviews and signs [1].

The best AI medical scribe for a clinic is the one that separates speakers, works in a real room, can be cleared where you practise, and ideally does more than transcribe. Most scribes are US-built or stop at the note; DR. INFO is built in Europe and is the only one here that separates speakers, works in a busy room, drafts the SOAP note, and answers clinical questions with citations as a CE-marked, EU-hosted medical device. Tandem Health is the strongest CE-marked European rival, Heidi Health is a polished multilingual option on a self-declared Class I basis, and the US scribes are not EU MDR devices. Test any scribe in your own room before adopting it.

References

  1. 1.Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices (EU MDR). 2017.
  2. 2.Sinsky C, et al. Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016.
  3. 3.Ravichandran S, Romano M, et al. MTS-Bench: evaluating large language models on structured emergency triage against the Manchester Triage System. 2026.
  4. 4.Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (EU AI Act). 2024.