DR. INFO answers clinical questions from peer reviewed literature, current guidelines and FDA and EMA sources, with citations you can check against the original. These pages compare that against the tools European clinicians are weighing up, and every claim carries a numbered source.
OpenEvidence withdrew from the EU and UK on 28 April 2026. Compare DR. INFO on citations, languages, EU regulation, availability and cost.
Read the comparison→A sourced 2026 ranking of clinical AI for physicians in Europe, with DR. INFO first.
Read the comparison→DR. INFO and AMBOSS solve different problems: AMBOSS is a knowledge library, DR. INFO a CE marked evidence answer engine with cited answers from guidelines.
Read the comparison→How DR. INFO and other tools compare with UpToDate, the paid clinical reference, with DR. INFO first.
Read the comparison→Which clinical AI tools are genuinely free for doctors in 2026, ranked, with DR. INFO first.
Read the comparison→Which medical AI is best for doctors? DR. INFO, AMBOSS, Vera Health, OpenEvidence and UpToDate compared on evidence, citations, language and regulation.
Read the comparison→Where a general model like ChatGPT helps a clinician, where it does not, and what a retrieval-grounded clinical tool adds.
Read the comparison→If you want ChatGPT's fluency but with citations, guideline coverage, EU hosting and a regulated status, this is what to use instead.
Read the comparison→Whichever tool you land on, these are the checks worth running before it reaches a patient.
Regulatory status decides this before features do. In the EU that means CE marking under EU MDR, GDPR compliant hosting, and a data protection officer who can sign it off.
Use real cases from your specialty, in the language you work in. General demos hide the gaps that matter to you.
Open the sources behind an answer. Check the reference exists, says what the answer claims, and applies to your patient.
A tool that says it does not know is safer than one that always produces a confident answer.
Ask who ran the evaluation, on what data, and whether the test resembles clinical work. A number without methods is marketing.