Best Glass Health alternatives for clinicians (2026): DR. INFO ranked #1

The best Glass Health alternatives, DR. INFO ranked #1

1. 1. DR. INFO

   The top Glass Health alternative for cited evidence: guideline coverage across European, American and international societies, citations to the source page, and a free tier.

   Key features:

   • Answers built from retrieved guidelines and peer reviewed literature, with citations to the source page
   • Guideline coverage across European, American and international societies, including ESC, NICE, KDIGO, IDSA and WHO, alongside national sets such as the German AWMF
   • Drug information from EMA and FDA authorised sources
   • Scribe, discharge letter, clinical reports and ICD code suggestions available alongside the answer engine
   • Answers in the language of the question; product in English, German, Portuguese and Dutch
   • Scored 0.72 on HealthBench Hard against OpenEvidence at 0.49 in the same 100 example run
   • DR. INFO Clinical, the cited answer engine, is a CE marked medical device under EU MDR 2017/745, Class I
   Access: Free tier for verified clinicians and students.
   Pros: DR. INFO names the guideline corpora it searches across ESC, NICE, KDIGO, IDSA, WHO and national sets such as AWMF, cites to the page, answers in the clinician's language, and offers scribe, discharge letter, report and ICD code flows alongside the answer engine.
   Cons: DR. INFO does not generate ranked differential diagnosis lists in the way Glass does, and it does not integrate with US record systems such as Epic or athenahealth.

2. 2. Vera Health

   A free US clinical search tool with a large calculator library.

   Key features: Cited answers with graded evidence; A large library of clinical calculators
   Access: Free for verified clinicians.
   Pros: Vera Health is free and pairs answers with a large library of clinical calculators.
   Cons: Vera Health is US based and is not presented as a CE marked EU medical device.

3. 3. Tandem Health

   A European ambient documentation system, CE marked at Class IIa.

   Key features: AI scribe, coding assistant and clinical decision support; CE marked Class IIa under EU MDR; European data centres; Over 100 PVS and KIS integrations
   Access: Pricing not published; contact sales.
   Pros: Tandem is CE marked at Class IIa, keeps data in Europe and integrates with more than 100 European record systems.
   Cons: Its decision support is framed around the visit the scribe documented, and it does not publish pricing or name its guideline corpora.

4. 4. OpenEvidence

   A widely used US answer engine, unavailable in the EU and UK since April 2026.

   Key features: Cited answers from the literature
   Access: Not accessible to doctors in the EU and UK.
   Pros: OpenEvidence is well established among clinicians in the United States.
   Cons: It withdrew from the EU and the UK in April 2026, so European clinicians cannot use it.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Glass Health alternative for EU clinicians?

DR. INFO, whose answer engine DR. INFO Clinical is a CE marked medical device under EU MDR 2017/745 hosted in the European Union, with a free tier, answers in the clinician's language and citations that open to the source page. Glass Health is US based and not presented as a CE marked EU medical device.

Is Glass Health CE marked or available in Europe?

Glass Health describes BAA-backed healthcare deployment, which is a US HIPAA arrangement, and its published clinical workflows are Epic, eClinicalWorks, athenahealth and Elation. It is not presented as a CE marked EU medical device with EU data residency.

How much does Glass Health cost compared with DR. INFO?

Glass Health publishes a free Lite tier and paid tiers at $20, $90 and $200 per month. DR. INFO has a free tier for verified clinicians and students. Both offer a way to evaluate the product before paying.

Does DR. INFO do differential diagnosis like Glass Health?

Glass generates differential diagnosis lists and assessment-and-plan drafts. DR. INFO answers clinical questions from retrieved guidelines and literature with citations, and includes scribe and discharge letter modules. If a ranked differential list is the specific requirement, Glass is built for that; if cited guideline evidence is the requirement, DR. INFO is.

Which clinical AI tools are CE marked in Europe?

DR. INFO Clinical, the cited answer engine, is CE marked under EU MDR 2017/745 at Class I, and Tandem Health states its products are CE marked at Class IIa. Glass Health, Vera Health and OpenEvidence are US based and are not presented as CE marked EU medical devices.

Does DR. INFO do scribing and coding like Glass Health?

DR. INFO offers a scribe that drafts a consultation note, a discharge letter flow, clinical reports and ICD code suggestions traceable to the documented text. Glass combines scribing with ranked differential diagnosis and assessment-and-plan generation in a single US-focused platform. The overlap is real; the difference is that DR. INFO is built around retrieving and citing guideline evidence.

References

1. 1.Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (EU MDR).
2. 2.Glass Health, Best Medical AI Tools and Apps 2026 (self description, pricing, named workflows).
3. 3.Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act).
4. 4.Glass Health, official website (product, pricing tiers, supported workflows).
5. 5.Ravichandran S, Kumar S, Corga Da Silva R, Romano M, et al. OpenAI's HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-based clinical assistant. arXiv:2509.02594.
6. 6.Arora RK, Wei J, Soskin Hicks R, et al. HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Toward Improved Human Health. arXiv:2505.08775.
7. 7.Breaking: OpenEvidence app access terminated in the UK and EU. Telehealth and Telecare Aware. 28 April 2026.