DR. INFOvsOpenEvidenceUpdated 17 October 2026

OpenEvidence in the Netherlands: is it available, and what do Dutch doctors use instead? (2026)

The best OpenEvidence alternative in the Netherlands is DR. INFO: a clinical AI built in Europe and hosted in the EU that writes a cited answer in Dutch from guidelines and literature, and can be used from the Netherlands and Belgium now that OpenEvidence has ended access from Europe. OpenEvidence terminated app access in the EU and the UK on 28 April 2026, citing regulatory uncertainty around European AI rules, and access from European addresses has been blocked since [1][2]. There was never a Dutch version: OpenEvidence answered in English from US-oriented sources. Dutch doctors still have the NHG-Standaarden and the Richtlijnendatabase of the Federatie Medisch Specialisten, both freely accessible and both documents to be read, not answers to a question [3][4]. On OpenAI's HealthBench Hard, DR. INFO scored 0.72 against OpenEvidence's 0.49 on the same 100 examples [5][6]. This page covers what happened, what remains, and how the options compare for a huisarts or a medisch specialist in the Netherlands. For those who used OpenEvidence the loss was practical: it was free for verified clinicians and answered a question in prose with sources. The Dutch guidelines do not fill that gap, because they are written to be consulted rather than to answer a question about the patient in front of you, and UpToDate is a subscription. What is missing is a tool that reads the guideline and the paper for you and shows where each sentence came from, which is what the comparison below is about.

DR. INFO and OpenEvidence, side by side

Available in the Netherlands and Belgium

DR. INFO Yes, on the web and the iPhone app

OpenEvidence No, access ended 28 April 2026

Answers in Dutch

DR. INFO Yes, in the language you ask in; Dutch interface

OpenEvidence No, English only

How it answers

DR. INFO A written answer built from retrieved guidelines and literature, each statement cited

OpenEvidence A written answer with citations, US-oriented sources

Data hosting

DR. INFO European Union, under GDPR

OpenEvidence United States

Guideline sources

DR. INFO European and national guidelines, retrieved per question; the NHG-Standaarden and the Richtlijnendatabase are public and can be asked about

OpenEvidence US-centred

Drug information

DR. INFO FDA and EMA authorised sources, EMA SmPC

OpenEvidence US sources

Documentation

DR. INFO Scribe with SOAP notes and discharge letters in the same product

OpenEvidence None

Regulatory status

DR. INFO CE marked medical device under EU MDR 2017/745

OpenEvidence Not CE marked

HealthBench Hard (same 100 examples)

DR. INFO 0.72

OpenEvidence 0.49

Cost

DR. INFO Free tier, paid plans

OpenEvidence Was free for verified clinicians

How DR. INFO compares with OpenEvidence

DR. INFO and OpenEvidence on HealthBench Hard

Rubric graded scores on difficult, open ended clinical conversations, from the same 100 example run. Higher is better.

0.250.500.751.000.72DR. INFO0.49OpenEvidence

Source: Ravichandran S, et al. OpenAI’s HealthBench in Action. arXiv:2509.02594.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenEvidence available in the Netherlands in 2026?
No. OpenEvidence terminated app access in the EU and the UK on 28 April 2026, and access from Dutch and other European addresses has been blocked since. The company cited regulatory uncertainty around European AI rules. No return date has been announced.
Is there a Dutch version of OpenEvidence?
No. OpenEvidence never answered in Dutch and had no Dutch interface; its sources were US-oriented. DR. INFO answers in the language you ask in, Dutch included, and the product itself is available in Dutch.
Does the OpenEvidence app still work in the Netherlands or Belgium?
Not from the Netherlands or Belgium: sign-in and access from European addresses have been blocked since April 2026, in the app and in the browser alike. DR. INFO works in the browser at app.drinfo.ai and on the iPhone app.
When will OpenEvidence come back?
There is no date. The withdrawal was tied to European AI regulation, so a return would be a decision by the company rather than a technical fix. A clinician who needs a cited answer to a clinical question today is better off not waiting for it.
Why did OpenEvidence leave Europe?
OpenEvidence withdrew from the EU and the UK together, citing uncertainty about European AI regulation, including the EU AI Act. Commentary in the medical press has treated the move as a sign of the regulatory divide between US health AI and European rules [7].
What do Dutch doctors use instead of OpenEvidence?
Two kinds of tool. The freely accessible Dutch sources: the NHG-Standaarden for general practice [3], the Richtlijnendatabase of the Federatie Medisch Specialisten [4] and the Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas for medicines [8], all documents to be consulted. And DR. INFO, a European clinical AI that answers a clinical question with citations you can open, hosts data in the EU, and includes a scribe and discharge letter drafting.
Is DR. INFO the best OpenEvidence alternative for Dutch doctors?
For a clinician who wanted what OpenEvidence did, a cited written answer to a clinical question, DR. INFO is the closest equivalent that can be used from the Netherlands: it retrieves guidelines and literature for each question, cites every statement, hosts data in the EU, answers in Dutch and scored 0.72 against OpenEvidence's 0.49 on HealthBench Hard.
How does DR. INFO cite its answers?
Each answer is written from documents retrieved for that question, and each statement carries a citation that opens the source: a guideline, a peer reviewed paper, or an FDA or EMA drug document. That makes the answer checkable in the way a colleague's summary is not. In a prospective pilot study published in Cureus in 2026, physicians using DR. INFO at the point of care rated that traceability as part of its value [9].
Can DR. INFO answer questions about the NHG-Standaarden and the Richtlijnendatabase?
The NHG-Standaarden and the guidelines in the Richtlijnendatabase are public documents, so DR. INFO can be asked about them and cites the source it used in the answer. DR. INFO is not affiliated with the NHG or the Federatie Medisch Specialisten, and the current guideline on their websites remains the version to rely on.
Where is the data hosted, and what does that mean for a Dutch practice?
DR. INFO is hosted in the European Union under GDPR, known in the Netherlands as the AVG. Whether a tool may be used with identifiable patient data remains a decision for each practice, hospital and institution, in the Netherlands with its own assessment and a DPIA where needed; the data protection officer is the person to ask.
Is DR. INFO free for doctors in the Netherlands?
There is a free tier for doctors and medical students, with paid plans for heavier use. DR. INFO works in the browser at app.drinfo.ai and on the iPhone app, from the Netherlands and Belgium.
Does DR. INFO also work in Belgium?
Yes. DR. INFO is available across Europe, Belgium included, and answers in Dutch, in French or in whichever language you ask in. National guidelines follow the country you set; European and international guidelines are returned whatever the country. Our Belgium page covers the Belgian references in detail.
Is DR. INFO a certified medical device?
Yes. DR. INFO is CE marked under EU MDR 2017/745 [10] and is developed and operated by Synduct GmbH in Munich.

OpenEvidence is not coming back to the Netherlands on any announced date, there was never a Dutch version, and the NHG-Standaarden and the Richtlijnendatabase were never an answer engine. For a doctor in the Netherlands or Flanders who wants a cited answer to a clinical question, DR. INFO is the tool to try first: built in Europe, hosted in the EU, in Dutch, free to start, and scoring higher than OpenEvidence on the hardest public benchmark of clinical answers.

References

  1. 1.Breaking: OpenEvidence app access terminated in the UK and EU. Telehealth and Telecare Aware. 28 April 2026.
  2. 2.The US-based medical search engine OpenEvidence is down in Europe: a commentary on regulatory complexities. Intelligence-Based Medicine. 2026.
  3. 3.Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap. NHG-Richtlijnen en NHG-Standaarden.
  4. 4.Federatie Medisch Specialisten. Richtlijnendatabase.
  5. 5.Ravichandran S, Kumar S, Corga Da Silva R, Romano M, et al. OpenAI’s HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries. arXiv:2509.02594. 2026.
  6. 6.Arora RK, Wei J, Soskin Hicks R, et al. HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Toward Improved Human Health. OpenAI. 2025.
  7. 7.OpenEvidence exits Europe, highlighting divide in health AI rules. Telehealth.org. 2026.
  8. 8.Zorginstituut Nederland. Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas.
  9. 9.Corga Da Silva R, Romano M, Mendes T, et al. DR. INFO at the Point of Care: A Prospective Pilot Study of Physician-Perceived Value of an Agentic Artificial Intelligence Clinical Assistant. Cureus. 2026.
  10. 10.Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices (EU MDR). Official Journal of the European Union. 2017.