Compare

Compare DR. INFO with clinical AI platforms

DR. INFO answers clinical questions from peer reviewed literature, current guidelines and FDA and EMA sources, with citations you can check against the original. These pages compare that against the tools European clinicians are weighing up, and every claim carries a numbered source.

How to compare clinical AI tools

Whichever tool you land on, these are the checks worth running before it reaches a patient.

  1. 01

    Check it is available and approvable where you practise

    Regulatory status decides this before features do. In the EU that means CE marking under EU MDR, GDPR compliant hosting, and a data protection officer who can sign it off.

  2. 02

    Test it on your own questions

    Use real cases from your specialty, in the language you work in. General demos hide the gaps that matter to you.

  3. 03

    Follow the citations

    Open the sources behind an answer. Check the reference exists, says what the answer claims, and applies to your patient.

  4. 04

    See what it does when evidence is thin

    A tool that says it does not know is safer than one that always produces a confident answer.

  5. 05

    Read the benchmark methods, not the score

    Ask who ran the evaluation, on what data, and whether the test resembles clinical work. A number without methods is marketing.